|  | 
Електронний архів Полтавського університету економіки і торгівлі >
Навчально-науковий інститут денної освіти >
 Кафедра міжнародної економіки та міжнародних економічних відносин >
 Матеріали конференцій (ННІДО МЕМЕВ) >
 
        
            | Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://dspace.puet.edu.ua/handle/123456789/8207 |  
 
| Название: | Problems of "profit" taxation of cooperatives: theoretical and practical aspects |  | Авторы: | Гончаренко, Владислав Васильович Пантелеймоненко, Андрій Олексійович
 Пожар, Артем Анатолійович
 |  | Ключевые слова: | кооператив оподаткування кооперативів
 неприбутковість кооперативів
 |  | Дата публикации: | 2019 |  | Аннотация: | The issue of taxation is very important for cooperatives in many countries. They often payprofit taxes on a general basis, like any other commercial company. At first glance, this seems tobe correct, since all forms of business should work under equal terms. However, such an approachis  fair  only  for  the   entities  which  have  similar  economic  nature  and  the  goal  of   maximizingreturns on   invested capital. But cooperatives significantly differ  from   businesses by nature andpurpose  of   their   activity.  This   purpose  is  not  to   maximize  return   on  invested   capital,  but   toprovide services to the members of coop. Therefore, the difference between the received incomeand the expenses incurred by cooperatives cannot be interpreted as  profit in the traditional senseof   this   word.   These   earnings   are   not   the   purpose   of   cooperative’s   activity.   They   havefundamentally   different   economic  nature.   This  is   confirmed   by   the   fact  that   existence   of   acooperative does not lose its sense even when its revenues do not exceed operating costs duringlong period of time, while functioning of any business in such circumstances is senseless.The   category  profit  is   derived  from   the   category  income.  All   cooperatives   can   beconditionally divided into 2 large groups. The first group is performed by the cooperatives whichreceive income  from their members as a result of supplying them with the necessary goods andservices. The second group is performed by co-ops which receive income for their members as aresult of selling goods and services produced by these members. In the first case, the cooperativereceives income from its members, who are its owners at the same time. Therefore, according toits nature, this money looks more like targeted financing rather than income. Therefore, taxationis not logical here. In the second case, the cooperative receives income not for itself, but for itsmembers by  selling   their products.  Therefore,  it  is   logical  to  tax   not the  cooperative,   but  themembers of the cooperative individually. Thus, co-operatives providing services exclusively totheir members  should  not be   taxed. If   a  cooperative  is   servicing the  customers  who are  non-members, only this part of cooperative business must be taxed. The proposed theoretical approachhas   been   successfully   used   in   Ukraine.   The   mentioned   arguments   allowed   credit   unions,agricultural servicing and housing cooperatives get the status of non-profit organizations. In theirturn, Ukrainian consumer cooperatives have not such a status because they serve the customerswho are not members. |  | URI: | http://dspace.puet.edu.ua/handle/123456789/8207 |  | Располагается в коллекциях: | Матеріали конференцій (ННІДО МЕМЕВ) 
 |  
 
    
     
    
 Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.   |